Bieschke, K. J., Bishop, R. M., & Garcia, V. L. (1996). The utility of the research self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 59-75.
Investigator practices and perspectives, Voluntariness and self-efficacy, College students and young adults, Ethics education, Educational institutions, United States, Quantitative (QT)
Coetzee, T., Hoffmann, W. A., & De Roubaix, M. (2015). An evaluation of research ethics in undergraduate health science research methodology programs at a South African university. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 10 (4), 389-394.
Research misconduct, College students and young adults, Ethics education, Educational institutions, South Africa, Qualitative (QL)
Fisher, C. B., & Fyrberg, D. (1994). Participant partners: College students weigh the costs and benefits of deceptive research. American Psychologist,49(5), 417.
Deception, Research risks and benefits, Research trust and mistrust, College students and young adults, Survey research, Educational institutions, United States, Mixed methods (MM)
Fisher, C. B., Fried, A. L., & Feldman, L. G. (2009). Graduate socialization in the responsible conduct of research: A national survey on the research ethics training experiences of psychology doctoral students. Ethics & behavior, 19(6), 496-518.
Investigator practices and perspectives, Research misconduct, College students and young adults, Ethics education, Educational institutions, United States, Quantitative (QT)
Fisher, C. B., Fried, A. L., Goodman, S. J., & Germano, K. K. (2009). Measures of mentoring, department climate, and graduate student preparedness in the responsible conduct of psychological research. Ethics & behavior, 19(3), 227-252.
Investigator practices and perspectives, Research misconduct, College students and young adults, Ethics education, Educational institutions, United States, Quantitative (QT)
Forester, M., Kahn, J. H., & Hesson-McInnis, M. S. (2004). Factor structures of three measures of research self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment,12(1), 3-16.
Investigator practices and perspectives, Voluntariness and self-efficacy, College students and young adults, Investigators, Research staff, Ethics education, Educational institutions, United States, Quantitative (QT)
Jui-An Pan, S., & Chou, C. (2014). Using a two-tier test to examine Taiwanese graduate students’ misunderstanding of responsible conduct of research. Ethics and Behavior, 25 (6), 500-527.
Investigator practices and perspectives, Research misconduct, College students and young adults, Research staff, Survey research, Educational institutions, Taiwan, Quantitative (QT)
Mecca, J. T., Medeiros, K. E., Giorgini, V., Gibson, C., Mumford, M. D., & Connelly, S. Biases and compensatory strategies: the efficacy of a training intervention. Ethics and Behavior, 26 (2), 128-143.
Investigator practices and perspectives, Research misconduct, College students and young adults, Ethics education, Survey research, Educational institutions, United States, Quantitative (QT)
Newman, E., Willard, T., Sinclair, R., & Kaloupek, D. (2001). Empirically supported ethical research practice: The costs and benefits of research from the participants’ view. Accountability in research, 8(4), 309-329.
Informed consent (adults), Research risks and benefits, College students and young adults,Clinical trials, Educational institutions, United States, Quantitative (QT)
Phillips, J. C., & Russell, R. K. (1994). Research self-efficacy, the research training environment, and research productivity among graduate students in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 22, 628-641.
Investigator practices and perspectives, Voluntariness and self-efficacy, College students and young adults, Investigators, Ethics education, Survey research, Educational institutions, United States, Quantitative (QT)
Roberts, L. W., Geppert, C., McCarty, T., & Obenshain, S. S. (2003). Evaluating medical students skills in obtaining informed consent for HIV testing. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18, 112-119.
Informed consent (adults), College students and young adults, People at risk for HIV, People at risk for or with other STIs, Educational institutions, United States, Quantitative (QT)
Sahin, Y. S., Iyigun, E., & Acikel, C. (2014). Validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the Modified Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire for student nurses. Ethics and Behavior, 25 (4), 351-359.
Clinical efficacy, College students and young adults, Ethics education, Survey research, Health-care facilities, Turkey, Quantitative (QT)
Senn, C. Y., & Desmarais, S. (2006). A new wrinkle on a old concern: Are the new ethics review requirements for explicit warnings in consent forms affecting the results of sexuality. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality.
Confidentiality and privacy, Informed consent (adults), College students and young adults,Clinical trials, Survey research, Educational institutions, Canada, Mixed methods (MM)
