College students and young adults

Bieschke, K. J., Bishop, R. M., & Garcia, V. L. (1996). The utility of the research self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 59-75.
Investigator practices and perspectives, Voluntariness and self-efficacyCollege students and young adults, Ethics education, Educational institutions, United StatesQuantitative (QT)

Coetzee, T., Hoffmann, W. A., & De Roubaix, M. (2015). An evaluation of research ethics in undergraduate health science research methodology programs at a South African university.  Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 10 (4), 389-394.
Research misconductCollege students and young adultsEthics educationEducational institutions, South Africa, Qualitative (QL)

Fisher, C. B., & Fyrberg, D. (1994). Participant partners: College students weigh the costs and benefits of deceptive research. American Psychologist,49(5), 417.
Deception, Research risks and benefits, Research trust and mistrust, College students and young adults, Survey research, Educational institutions, United StatesMixed methods (MM)

Fisher, C. B., Fried, A. L., & Feldman, L. G. (2009). Graduate socialization in the responsible conduct of research: A national survey on the research ethics training experiences of psychology doctoral students. Ethics & behavior, 19(6), 496-518.
Investigator practices and perspectives, Research misconduct, College students and young adults, Ethics education, Educational institutions, United StatesQuantitative (QT)

Fisher, C. B., Fried, A. L., Goodman, S. J., & Germano, K. K. (2009). Measures of mentoring, department climate, and graduate student preparedness in the responsible conduct of psychological research. Ethics & behavior, 19(3), 227-252.
Investigator practices and perspectives, Research misconduct, College students and young adults, Ethics education, Educational institutions, United StatesQuantitative (QT)

Forester, M., Kahn, J. H., & Hesson-McInnis, M. S. (2004). Factor structures of three measures of research self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment,12(1), 3-16.
Investigator practices and perspectivesVoluntariness and self-efficacyCollege students and young adultsInvestigators, Research staff, Ethics education, Educational institutionsUnited StatesQuantitative (QT)

Jui-An Pan, S., & Chou, C. (2014). Using a two-tier test to examine Taiwanese graduate students’ misunderstanding of responsible conduct of research. Ethics and Behavior, 25 (6), 500-527.
Investigator practices and perspectivesResearch misconductCollege students and young adultsResearch staff, Survey researchEducational institutions, TaiwanQuantitative (QT)

Mecca, J. T., Medeiros, K. E., Giorgini, V., Gibson, C., Mumford, M. D., & Connelly, S. Biases and compensatory strategies: the efficacy of a training intervention. Ethics and Behavior, 26 (2), 128-143.
Investigator practices and perspectivesResearch misconductCollege students and young adultsEthics education, Survey researchEducational institutionsUnited StatesQuantitative (QT) 

Newman, E., Willard, T., Sinclair, R., & Kaloupek, D. (2001). Empirically supported ethical research practice: The costs and benefits of research from the participants’ view. Accountability in research, 8(4), 309-329.
Informed consent (adults), Research risks and benefits, College students and young adults,Clinical trials, Educational institutions, United StatesQuantitative (QT)

Phillips, J. C., & Russell, R. K. (1994). Research self-efficacy, the research training environment, and research productivity among graduate students in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 22, 628-641.
Investigator practices and perspectives, Voluntariness and self-efficacy, College students and young adults, Investigators, Ethics educationSurvey researchEducational institutions, United States, Quantitative (QT)

Roberts, L. W., Geppert, C., McCarty, T., & Obenshain, S. S. (2003). Evaluating medical students skills in obtaining informed consent for HIV testing. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18, 112-119.
Informed consent (adults), College students and young adults, People at risk for HIV, People at risk for or with other STIs, Educational institutions, United States, Quantitative (QT)

Sahin, Y. S., Iyigun, E., & Acikel, C. (2014). Validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the Modified Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire for student nurses. Ethics and Behavior, 25 (4), 351-359.
Clinical efficacyCollege students and young adultsEthics education, Survey researchHealth-care facilities, Turkey, Quantitative (QT)

Senn, C. Y., & Desmarais, S. (2006). A new wrinkle on a old concern: Are the new ethics review requirements for explicit warnings in consent forms affecting the results of sexuality. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality.
Confidentiality and privacy, Informed consent (adults), College students and young adults,Clinical trials, Survey research, Educational institutionsCanadaMixed methods (MM)

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s