Eldridge, G. D., Robinson, R., Corey, S., Brems, C., & Johnson, M. E. (2012). Ethical challenges in conducting HIV/AIDS research in correctional settings. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 18(4), 309-318.
Confidentiality and privacy, Informed consent (adults), Investigator practices and perspectives, IRB practices and perspectives, Investigators, IRB members, Research staff, Incarcerated, detained, or previously incarcerated individuals, People at risk for HIV, Prisons, United States, Qualitative (QL)
Fischer, B. A., & George, P. (2010). The investigator and the IRB: A survey of depression and schizophrenia researchers. Schizophrenia research, 122(1-3), 206.
Investigator practices and perspectives, IRB practices and perspectives, Adults with mental health disorders, Adults with neurological disorders, Investigators, IRB members, Research staff, Clinical trials, Educational institutions, United States, Quantitative (QT)
Hanson, B. L., Faulkner, S. A., Brems, C., Corey, S. L., Eldridge, G. D., Johnson, M. E. (2015). Key stakeholders’ perceptions of motivators for research participation among individuals who are incarcerated. JERHRE, 10 (4), 350-370.
Investigator practices and perspectives, IRB practices and perspectives, Voluntariness and self-efficacy, Incarcerated, detained, or previously incarcerated individuals, Investigators, IRB members, Community-engaged research, Prisons, United States, Qualitative (QL)
Hemminki, E., Virtanen, J. I., & Regushevskaya, E. (2015). Decisions by Finnish medical research ethics committees: a nationwide study of process and outcomes. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 10 (4), 404-413.
IRB practices and perspectives, IRB members, Clinical trials, Finland, Quantitative (QT)
Keith-Spiegel, P. & Koocher, G. P. (2005). Institutional Review Board Researcher Assessment Tool (IRB-RAT).
Investigator practices and perspectives, IRB practices and perspectives, Investigators, IRB members, Research staff, United States, Quantitative (QT)
Kim, SYH, Holloway, R., Frank, S., Wilson, R., Kieburtz, K. (2008). Trust in early phase research: therapeutic optimism and protective pessimism. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy. 11(4), 393-401.
Informed consent (adults), IRB practices and perspectives, Research risks and benefits, Research trust and mistrust, Therapeutic misconception, IRB members, Clinical trials, Survey research, United States, Qualitative (QL)
Kimberly, M. B., Hoehn, K. S., Feudtner, C., Nelson, R. M., & Schreiner, M. (2006). Variation in standards of research compensation and child assent practices: a comparison of 69 institutional review board–approved informed permission and assent forms for 3 multicenter pediatric clinical trials. Pediatrics, 117(5), 1706-1711.
Assent and self-consent (children and adolescents), Informed consent (adults), Investigator practices and perspectives, IRB practices and perspectives, Investigators, IRB members,Children, Clinical trials, United States, Quantitative (QT)
Klitzman, R. (2008). Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees. Developing World Bioethics, 8(3), 207-218.
IRB practices and perspectives, Government officials and staff, IRB members, Clinical trials, Government agencies, South Africa, United States, Quantitative (QT)
Lairumbi, G. M., Michael, P., Fitzpatrick, R., & English, M. C. (2012). Forms of benefit sharing in global health research undertaken in resource poor settings: A qualitative study of stakeholders views in Kenya. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 7(7).
Research risks and benefits, Adults (other), Community Advisory Board, Investigators, IRB members, Policy makers, Clinical trials, Health-care facilities, South Africa, Qualitative (QL)
Ripley, E., Macrina, F., Markowitz, M., & Gennings, C. (2010). Why do we pay? A national survey of investigators and IRB chairpersons. Journal of empirical research on human research ethics: JERHRE, 5(3), 43.
Investigator practices and perspectives, IRB practices and perspectives, Investigators, IRB members, Clinical trials, Educational institutions, United States, Quantitative (QT)
Shah, S., Whittle, A., Wilfond, B., Gensler, G., & Wendler, D. (2004). How do institutional review boards apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatric research?. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association,291(4), 476-482.
IRB practices and perspectives, Research risks and benefits, IRB members, Clinical trials,Survey research, Health-care facilities, United States, Quantitative (QT)
Silaigwana, B., & Wassenaar, D. (2015). Biomedical research ethics committees in Sub-Saharan Africa: a collective review of their structure, functioning, and outcomes. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 10 (2), 169-184.
IRB practices and perspectives, Adults (other), IRB members, Clinical trials, Educational institutions, Health-care facilities, South Africa, Mixed Methods (MM)
Tsang, T. S. M., Jones, M., & Meneilly, G. S. (2015). Analysis of research ethics board approval times in an academic department of medicine. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 10 (2), 145-150.
IRB practices and perspectives, Adults (other), IRB members, Clinical trials, Educational institutions, Canada, Quantitative (QT)
